Skip to main content

Enhancing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility (IDEA) in Open Educational Resources (OER): Introduction

Enhancing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility (IDEA) in Open Educational Resources (OER)
Introduction
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeDigital Pedagogy 2: 2 OER 2 Curious
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Table Of Contents
  5. Acknowledgment of First Peoples
  6. Accessibility Information
  7. About the Editor
  8. Peer Reviewers
  9. Introduction
  10. Definitions
  11. Framework for Reviewing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility in Open Educational Resources
  12. Diverse and Inclusive Imagery
  13. Example Names
  14. Inclusive Language
  15. Researchers and References
  16. Diverse Examples and Balanced Perspectives
  17. Appropriate Terminology and Inclusive Metadata
  18. Indigenisation, Decolonisation and Cultural Inclusion
  19. Accessibility, Usability and Universal Design for Learning
  20. Anti-Racist and Inclusive Open Pedagogy
  21. Resources
  22. References
  23. Accessibility Assessment

5

Introduction

Content advertised as “open access” and “freely accessible” may give the impression that open educational resources (OER) are universally accessible, but many users still face inequitable barriers to access. Additionally, access doesn’t equal inclusion. Textbooks often express sexism and racism contents and exclude marginalised voices. We need to consider how to contribute to a transformation and expand open access to resources to truly address diversity, equity, and inclusion. Dr Sarah Lambert (2018) provides a framework for this transition. Lambert (2018) identifies and expands on three principles of social justice that may be applied to OER: redistributive justice, recognitive justice, and representational justices. Lambert notes that providing free textbooks to learners of colour is redistributive justice in action. It reduces the costs and increases the chances of success for learners who “by circumstance have less” (Lambert, 2018, p.227)—i.e., they are marginalised in education, workplaces and more broadly in society.

In her article, Lambert (2018) asks how “open” the textbook is for marginalised learners if First Nations students, and learners of colour are invisible inside the textbook and perhaps invisible in the whole curriculum. She notes that making edits to include images and cases featuring more diverse communities, businesses, and people will be an act of recognitive justice. Lambert (2018) goes on to ask additional questions, including what the implications are if the textbook features people of colour, but does not value their perspectives, knowledge or histories and what happens if the textbook takes a white colonial view of black lives? What implications follow if black stories are told solely by white voices? Lambert (2018) argues that the development or selection of a new version of a textbook, or perhaps a new resource altogether, written by people of colour where they are free to represent their own views, histories, and knowledges would be an act of representational justice, giving voice to those who are often not heard. The table below summarises these three principles in the context of open education.

Social Justice PrincipleOpen Education Example
Redistributive JusticeFree educational resources, textbooks, or courses to
learners who by circumstance of socio-cultural
position cannot afford them, particularly learners who
could be excluded from education or be more likely
to fail due to lack of access to learning materials.
Recognitive JusticeSocio-cultural diversity in the open curriculum.
Inclusion of images, case studies, and knowledge of
women, first nations people, and whomever is
marginalised in any particular national, regional, or
learning context. Recognition of diverse views and
experiences as legitimate within open assignments
and feedback.
Representational JusticeSelf-determination of marginalised people and
groups to speak for themselves and not have their
stories told by others. Co-construction of OER texts
and resources about learners of colour by learners of
colour, about women’s experiences by women, about
LGBTIQA+ experiences by LGBTIQA+ identifying people.
Facilitation to ensure quiet and minority views have
equal air-time in open online discussions.

Table 1: Social Justice and Open Education. Source: Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education by Sarah Lambert, licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.

Our Mission

We deeply value the diverse users of our books, and seek to include and impact each staff and student user in a positive and considerate manner. During our development processes, the University of Southern Queensland (UniSQ) undertakes substantial efforts to properly represent genders, races, cultures, geographies, ethnic backgrounds, disabilities, nationalities, ages, sexual orientations, socio-economic status, and diverse viewpoints in our books. We seek to avoid any offense, and ensure that every reader can see themselves in our books. We hold primarily to the notion, expressed by Jasmine Roberts (Ohio State), that we should not leave it to underrepresented groups to spearhead these conversations and efforts.

To that end, we have created general guidelines for development and improvement, adapted from OpenStax’s Improving Representation and Diversity in OER Materials [PDF]. Our adaption was developed and peer-review by input from staff, students and researchers across Australia. This is an ongoing and continually evolving effort. We will seek input and monitor changes in terminology, sensitivity, policies, and descriptions in our materials. We will also welcome and engage with individuals and groups who share our commitment and/or have specific guidance, feedback, or suggestions. We would value input on our approach, on specific items or additions we can consider or add to increase diverse representation, and so on. If you have any feedback please email Nikki.Andersen@usq.edu.au.

The framework and practical resources for enhancing inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility is found in the following pages. However to get a better idea of the relationship between open education and social justice, please feel free to browse through the resources below, and familiarise yourself with key definitions.

Resources

The following resources will introduce you to issues relating to social justice and open education.

  • Open Textbooks and Social Justice: a National Scoping Study: This study investigated the potential for open textbooks to assist with improving the experience and outcomes of under-represented higher education students in the Australian context.
  • Open at the Margins: Critical Perspectives in Open Education: This book represents a starting point towards curating and centering marginal voices and non-dominant epistemic stances in open education. It includes the work of 43 diverse authors whose perspectives challenge the dominant hegemony.

Copyright note: This section has been adapted in part from:

  • Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education by Sarah Lambert, licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 licence. 
  • Improving Representation and Diversity in OER Materials [PDF] by OpenStax, licensed under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Definitions
PreviousNext

Copyright © 2022

                                by University of Southern Queensland

            Enhancing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility (IDEA) in Open Educational Resources (OER) by University of Southern Queensland is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org