Skip to main content

Showing Theory to Know Theory: Alterity

Showing Theory to Know Theory
Alterity
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeShowing Theory to Know Theory
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Book Information
    1. Copyright
    2. Table Of Contents
    3. Acknowledgments
    4. How did the book come about?
    5. Submissions and Review
    6. Adopting this book
    7. Accessibility Statement
    8. About the Editors
  2. Introduction
    1. How to use this book
  3. Abjection
  4. Affect
  5. Affordances
  6. Allyship
  7. Alterity
  8. Anthropocene
  9. Assemblage
  10. Cartesianism
  11. Citizenship
  12. Commodification
  13. Complexity
  14. Corporeality
  15. Critical Pedagogy
  16. Discourse
  17. Emergence
  18. Emotional Turn
  19. Epistemology
  20. Epistemology of Dissent
  21. Extractivism
  22. Feminist Historiography
  23. Food Sovereignty
  24. Financialization
  25. Gendered Messaging
  26. Genealogy
  27. Governance
  28. Habitus and Field
  29. Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony
  30. Ideology
  31. Intersectionality
  32. Landscape
  33. Mediatization
  34. Methodology
  35. Mobilities
  36. More-than-human
  37. Neoliberalism
  38. Objectivity
  39. Ontological Multiplicity
  40. Othering
  41. Path Dependence
  42. Personal Agency
  43. Positionality
  44. Positivism
  45. Postfeminism
  46. Poststructuralism
  47. Prefiguration
  48. Queer
  49. Racial Fragility
  50. Racial Passing
  51. Racialization
  52. Reciprocity
  53. Reflexivity
  54. Relationality
  55. Resistance
  56. Right to the City
  57. Science and Technology Studies
  58. Situatedness
  59. Social Identity
  60. Social Nature
  61. Sovereignty
  62. Structural Power
  63. Subjectivity
  64. Sustainability
  65. Tacit Knowledge
  66. Transdisciplinarity
  67. Transparency
  68. Triangulation
  69. Visualization
  70. Whiteness
  71. Recommended Citations

Alterity

Yael Cameron Klangwisan

Alterity is a term that refers to difference and otherness, specifically how the Other’s difference plays a role in conceptualising one’s own Self.

Yael Cameron Klangwisan is a senior lecturer in education at the Auckland University of Technology. Her research interests are interdisciplinary, spanning education, poetics, and religious studies, and connected by a focus on critical theory. She has published widely in these areas.

Oedipus and the Sphinx

The original epic of Oedipus and the Sphinx is a lost poem. This is itself a fascinating feature of the legend. We do not even have the entire telling of it. We only have what amounts to little pieces of a greater mosaic. In this telling, our scene takes place in the desert near Thebes, in Ancient Greece. There are two characters here, protagonist and antagonist, and at the moment of meeting the desert peels away until we are left with only these two, face to face.

In the first of the two figures, we have Oedipus. Raven-haired Oedipus is a young man of mysterious origins. He does not know where he comes from or who he is. This question of identity hangs over his head and troubles him. He is a young man, a handsome one, and a hero. He is a man who yearns to prove himself. He is desperate to become someone. Thus, he has come into the desert to confront the Theban Sphinx and win or die in the attempt.

The other figure in the tale is the Sphinx, a monstrous creature with a woman’s face. It is with some irony that we know, according to Apollodorus exactly, where she comes from and who she is. Sphinx is the daughter of two unnatural, serpentine creatures: Echidna and Typhon (or, according to Hesiod, Orthus, the three-headed dog). Sphinx has the face of a woman, but the body of a lion and the wings of an eagle. In this tale she is alone and dangerous in the desert, having wreaked havoc on Thebes, slaughtering its young men.

painting on pottery fragment showing Oedipus and the Sphinx facing each other
Figure 1: “Attic Kylix of the Painter of Oedipus” Vulci, 470 B.C. Painted red figure ceramic, conserved height 7.2 cm; diameter 26.3 cm. Cat. 16541. Vatican Museum, Rome.

On the Attic Kylix above, we see the moment of meeting captured by the Painter of Oedipus. Oedipus sits below, with the Sphinx on the pedestal above him. They are frozen in time. Face to face, their gazes lock onto each other. Oedipus’s gaze is on this creature. He is recognisably human, a man, one of us. The lonely Sphinx is Other. She is the product of a ghastly union between horrors. She is a terrifying amalgamation of human and animal parts. She is altogether strange. Oedipus becomes more man than ever before in this moment of locking gazes with the Sphinx. Oedipus finally becomes a subject in the mirror of the Sphinx’s gaze.

The Sphinx has a riddle that she learned from the muses. She sings to Oedipus, “What is that which has one voice and yet becomes four-footed and two-footed and three-footed?” This is a pertinent riddle for canny Oedipus, and he works it out immediately. “A man,” he replies, because the riddle is the sum of his own life story. He is the one that has one voice, he once crawled on all fours, he now stands on two feet, and one day he will have to lean on his staff as an old man. This is who he is.

The Sphinx, defeated, dies on the spot. In one retelling she hurls herself from the citadel, and in another retelling, it is Oedipus who runs her through with his weapon. This tale is one way to explore the concept of Alterity. Alterity is, at its core, a relationship between Self and Other, where difference plays a defining role. What is understood as the Self crystallises in this moment.

Discussion Questions

  • Imagine you are Oedipus in this pair? What or who do you see?
  • If you were Oedipus, how might this meeting with a radically different Other make you feel more human, more a subject?
  • Imagine you are the Sphinx in this pair? What might it feel like to be seen as so radically Other?
  • How does gender operate in this vignette? How might this vignette play out between pairs of different cultures, genders, sexualities, religions, or class?

Exercise

Watch the scene, “The Council of Elrond” from the film, The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. How do the author J.R.R. Tolkien and the filmmaker Peter Jackson present alterity in the encounters between races and peoples of Middle Earth? How does alterity figure as a feature of the Fellowship?

Additional Resources

Apollodorus. (1998). The library of Athens. Oxford World Classics.

Levinas, E. (1999). Alterity and transcendence. Columbia University Press.

Renger, A. (2013). Oedipus and the Sphinx. University of Chicago Press.

Sophocles. (1991). Sophocles: The complete Greek tragedies. University of Chicago Press.

Vaccaro, C., & Kisor, Y. (2017). Tolkien and alterity. Palgrave McMillan.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Anthropocene
PreviousNext

Copyright © 2022

                                by Showing Theory Press

            Showing Theory to Know Theory by Showing Theory Press is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org