Skip to main content

Malleus Maleficarum: Question IV

Malleus Maleficarum
Question IV
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeWestern Humanities, from 1400
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Introduction To The Malleus Maleficarum
  2. Introduction To The 1948 Version
  3. Part I
    1. Question I
    2. Question II
    3. Question III
    4. Question IV
    5. Question V
    6. Question VI
    7. Question VII
    8. Question VIII
    9. Question IX
    10. Question X
    11. Question XI
    12. Question XII
    13. Question XIII
    14. Question XIV
    15. Question XV
    16. Question XVI
    17. Question XVII
    18. Question XVIII
  4. Part II
    1. Question I
    2. Question II
  5. Part III
    1. General And Introductory
    2. Question I
    3. Question II
    4. Question III
    5. Question IV
    6. Question V
    7. Question VI
    8. Question VII
    9. Question VIII
    10. Question IX
    11. Question X
    12. Question XI
    13. Question XII
    14. Question XIII
    15. Question XIV
    16. Question XV
    17. Question XVI
    18. The Third Head
    19. Question XVII
    20. Question XVIII
    21. Question XIX
    22. Question XX
    23. Question XXI
    24. Question XXII
    25. Question XXIII
    26. Question XXIV
    27. Question XXV
    28. Question XXVI
    29. Question XXVII
    30. Question XXVIII
    31. Question XXIX
    32. Question XXX
    33. Question XXXI
    34. Question XXXII
    35. Question XXXIII
    36. Question XXXIV
    37. Question XXXV

Question IV

Of the Quality and Condition of Witnesses.

Note that persons under a sentence of excommunication, associates and accomplices in the crime, notorious evildoers and criminals, or servants giving evidence against their masters, are admitted as witnesses in a case concerning the Faith. And just as a heretic may give evidence against a heretic, so may a witch against a witch; but this only in default of other proofs, and such evidence can only be admitted for the prosecution and not for the defence: this is true also of the evidence of the prisoner's wife, sons and kindred; for the evidence of such has more weight in proving a charge than in disproving it.

This is made clear in the c. in fidei de haer., where it says: As a protection of the faith we allow that in a case of inquiry into the sin of heresy, persons under excommunication and partners and accomplices in the crime shall be admitted as witnesses, in default of other proofs against heretics and their patrons, protectors and defenders; provided that it appears probably both from the number of the witnesses and of those against whom they give evidence, and from other circumstances, that they are not giving false testimony.

The case of evidence given by perjurers, when it is presumed that they are speaking out of zeal for the faith, is deal with in the Canon c. accusatus, § licet, where it says that the evidence of perjurers, after they have repented, is admissable; and it goes on to say: If it manifestly appears that they do not speak in a spirit of levity, or from motives of enmity, or by reason of a bribe, but purely out of zeal for the orthodox faith, wishing to correct what they have said, or to reveal something about which they had kept silence, in defence of the faith, their testimony shell be as valid as that of anyone else, provided that there is no other objection to it.

And it is clear from the same chapter of the Canon that the testimony of men or low repute and criminals, and of servants against their masters, is admitted; for it says: So great is the plague of heresy that, in an action involving this crime, even servants are admitted as witnesses against their masters, and any criminal evildoer may give evidence against any person soever.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Question V
PreviousNext
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org