Skip to main content

The Holy Family: The Holy Family or Critique of Critical Criticism. Against Bruno Bauer and Company

The Holy Family
The Holy Family or Critique of Critical Criticism. Against Bruno Bauer and Company
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Holy Family
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Foreword
  2. I: "Critical Criticism in the Form of a Master-Bookbinder", or Critical Criticism as Herr Reichardt
  3. II: "Critical Criticism" As a 'Mill-Owner', Or Critical Criticism As Herr Jules Faucher
  4. III: "The Thoroughness of Critical Criticism", Or Critical Criticism As Herr J. (Jungnitz?)
  5. IV: "Critical Criticism" As the Tranquility of Knowledge, Or "Critical Criticism" As Herr Edgar
    1. 1. Flora Tristian's "Union Ouvrière"
    2. 2. Bèraud on Prostitutes
    3. 3. Love
    4. 4. Proudhon
  6. V: "Critical Criticism" as a Mystery-Monger, Or "Critical Criticism" as Herr Szeliga
    1. 1. "The Mystery of Degeneracy in Civilisation" and "The Mystery of Richtlessness in the State"
    2. 2. The Mystery of Speculative Construction
    3. 3. "The Mystery of Educated Society"
    4. 4. "The Mystery of Probity and Piety"
    5. 5. "Mystery, a Mockery"
    6. 6. Turtle-Dove (Rigolette)
    7. 7. The World System of the Mysteries of Paris
  7. VI. Absolute Critical Criticism, Or Critical Criticism As Herr Bruno
    1. 1. Absolute Criticism's First Campaign
      1. a. "Spirit" and "Mass"
      2. b. The Jewish Question No. 1: The Setting of the Questions
      3. c. Hinrichs No. 1: Mysterious Hints on Politics, Socialism, and Philosophy
    2. 2. Absolute Criticism's Second Campaign
      1. a. Hinrich's No. 2: "Criticism" and "Feuerbach". Condemnation of Philosophy
      2. b. The Jewish Question No. 2: Critical Discoveries on Socialism, Jurisprudence, and Politics (Nationality)
    3. 3. Absolute Criticism's Third Campaign
      1. a. Absolute Criticism's Self-Apology: Its "Political" Past
      2. b. The Jewish Question No. 3
      3. c. Critical Battle Against the French Revolution
      4. d. Critical Battle Against French Materialism
      5. e. Final Defeat of Socialism
      6. f. The Speculative Cycle of Absolute Criticism and the Philosophy of Self-Consciousness
  8. VII: Critical Criticism's Correspondence
    1. 1. The Critical Mass
    2. 2. The "Un-Critical Mass" and "Critical Criticism"
      1. a. The "Obdurate Mass" and the "Unsatisfied Mass"
      2. b. The "Soft-Hearted" Mass "Pining for Redemption"
      3. c. Grace Bestowed on the Mass
    3. 3. The Un-Critically Critical Mass Or "Criticism" and The "Berlin Couleur"
  9. VIII: The Earthly Course and Transfiguration Of "Critical Criticism"
    1. 1. Critical Transformation of a Butcher into a Dog, Or Chourineur
    2. 2. Revelation of the Mystery of Critical Religion, Or Fleur De Marie
      1. a. The Speculative "Marguerite"
      2. b. Fleur de Marie
    3. 3. Revelation of the Mysteries of Law
      1. a. The maître d'école, or the New Penal Theory
      2. b. Reward and Punishment: Double Punishment (with a Table)
      3. c. Abolition of Degeneracy Within Civilisation and of Rightlessness in the State
    4. 4. The Revealed Mystery of the "Standpoint"
    5. 5. Revelation of the Mystery of the Utilisation of Human Impulses
    6. 6. Revelation of the Mystery of the Emancipation of Women
    7. 7. Revelation of Political Economic Mysteries
      1. a. Theoretical Revelation of Political Economic Mysteries
      2. b. "The Bank for the Poor"
      3. c. Model Farm at Bouqueval
    8. 8. Rudolph, "The Revealed Mystery of All Mysteries"
  10. IX: The Critical Last Judgement
  11. England and Materialist Philosophy
  12. Notes

The Holy Family
or Critique of Critical Criticism.
Against Bruno Bauer and Company


"When I visited Marx in Paris in the summer of 1844, our complete agreement in all theoretical fields became evident and our joint work dates from that time."  Frederick Engels


Written: between September and November 1844;
First Published: The book was first published in February 1845, Frankfurt am Main. The work was never translated into English in either man's lifetime;
Translated: This 1956 English translation is by Richard Dixon and Clement Dutts and is taken from the 1845 German edition;
Transcribed for the MEIA by Peter Byrne, 1997. Andy Blunden has continued the transcribing from Chapter VI onwards and made slight modifications to the mark-up to blend the two jobs;
Source: MECW Volume 4, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1975.


During Engels' short stay in Paris in 1844, Marx suggested the two of them should write a critique of the rage of their day, the Young Hegelians. In the doing was born the first joint writing project between the two men -- and a life-long association that would change the world.

At the end of August, 1844, Engels passed through Paris, en route to his employment in Manchester, England, from visiting his family in Barmen (Germany). During 10 days in the French capital, he met Marx (for the second time).

After talking, they began drawing up plans for a book about the Young Hegelian trend of thought very popular in academic circles. Agreeing to co-author the Foreword, they divided up the other sections. Engels finished his assigned chapters before leaving Paris. Marx had the larger share of work, and he completed it by the end of November 1844. (Marx would draw from his Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, on which he'd been working the spring and summer of 1844.)

The foremost title line — "The Holy Family" — was added at the suggestion of the book publisher Lowenthal. It's a sarcastic reference to the Bauer brothers and their supporters.

The book made something of a splash in the newspapers. One paper noted, that it expressed socialist views since it criticised the "inadequacy of any half-measures directed at eliminating the social ailments of our time." The conservative press immediately recognized the radical elements inherent in its many arguments. One paper wrote that, in The Holy Family, "every line preaches revolt... against the state, the church, the family, legality, religion and property." It also noted that "prominence is given to the most radical and the most open communism, and this is all the more dangerous as Mr. Marx cannot be denied either extremely broad knowledge or the ability to make use of the polemical arsenal of Hegel's logic, what is customarily called 'iron logic.'"

Lenin would later claim this work laid the foundations for what would develop into a scientific revolutionary materialist socialism.

Bruno Bauer attempted to rebut the book in the article "Charakteristik Ludwig Feuerbachs" — which was published in Wigand's Vierteljahrsschrift, Leipzig 1845. Bauer essentially claimed that Marx and Engels misunderstood what he was really saying. Marx would reply to that article with his own article — published in the journal Gesellschaftsspiegel, Elberfeld, January 1846. And the matter was also discussed in chapter 2 of The German Ideology.


Annotate

Next Chapter
Table of Contents
PreviousNext
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org